Right to keep and bear arms.

England RKBA

Tonight we will go through the customs, ancient laws and rights to defend yourself as Christians. This right is maintained until the British political union unlawfully restricted it.

But first and explanation and answer to a question from a member and subscriber.

“Hi, Graham,

               Just finished watching last night's great show, and I have a query, knowing what a bunch of manky bastards the establishment are, my question is this, since the Nationality Act and calling the countries of Great Britain the United Kingdom, does this negate the Declaration Act and The Acts of Union as legally England and Scotland does not exist ?

XXXX XXXXXXXX AKA Essexenglishman

PS, No need to apologize for your rants for you are a passionate Englishman and long may you be so



That is a good question!

What you have done is come to the same conclusion as me. Why did they create the nationality act 1981? Because they think in their tiny delusional minds by removing the nationalities of Britain (an Island) via “their (British)” sovereign parliament doctrine that they can negate all of our rights [to negate is the reverse positive, ratify]. By wiping out the nationalities. That is what the soviets did via the USSR and what the EU intended.

Their problem is that you can’t do that in a common law jurisdiction. Because the common law is more powerful than administrative law (roman law). why is it? Because the common law allows for repugnant law to be made null and void. Administrative law does not have that facility available to it.

In Administrative law (roman law) or EU, USSR and British Administrative law they constructed the parliament as all powerful and made judges administrators only. Judges are subservient to and under parliament, they are not a co-equal capable of annulling repugnant laws of parliament. Administrative systems have a system called desuetude, common law does NOT have this doctrine which is crucial.

you will understand why this is so very important to know why we are under attack by reading this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desuetude [note who else has does not have desuetude].

The King. was a co-equal as the executive. His job was to ensure Gods law 3 6 9 (separation of power) was enforced.

In effect under the common law, we in England recreated gods law where there are co-equals 3 6 9. Time in memorial is pie. On earth as it is in heaven. So mote it be. So heaven could never become unjust nor could England.

Separation of powers is God’s law.

English Common Law;
3 is Judiciary (judgement)
6 Is parliament (men)
9 is the King (executive)

American common law;

3 Judiciary (judgement)
6 Is parliament (men)
9 President (executive)

whereas 666 is man made law with no checks on its power. Evil. Who created a system via the union parliament to impose upon the English administrative law? The British Union. Why? Marxists.

6 Is parliament judiciary (men)

6 Is parliament nod through laws (men)

6 Is parliament monarchy has no authority (men)

No separation is Tyranny.

The law maketh the King, the law maketh the Judge, the law maketh parliament. The constitution of England maketh all three as co-equal and human beings are God’s children. No matter their colour. Racism is a construct of divide and rule. Terribly British.

“thy kingdom come; thy will be done; on earth as it is in heaven.”

where have you heard this before?

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits.”

Fabians logo is a wolf in sheep’s clothing (Marx/Lenin) “who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. “ Who are fabians over 300 MPs on all sides. Tories, Labour and LibDem. British.

Martin Luther King understood it – “One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” MLK

“A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” MLK

who said that the “law of God was English Law, and English law was God’s law”. 1649

A law above the law.

“An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law” MLK

Published by Graham Moore

I believe in Liberty, Freedom and fairness for all. Sick of political correctness and mind and thought control. The Rule of Law, Common Law.

2 thoughts on “Right to keep and bear arms.

  1. what laws that I’m armed to the teeth me what law again ? Never heard of it owning a .348 Winchester is that a naked weapon? I never have thought about shooting Winnie the Pooh with it though, but if I lent it to a weaver they might find it handy, them there Chinese weavers don’t get on too well with bears but under duress the weavers make the worlds most lovely crimplene jumpers for free in their provided holiday camps scattered around China

  2. Your shows are getting better + better by the day DD, just as the britshits are getting weaker + weaker by the day.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: