Trilogy explaining the difference between English and British. Don’t be fooled by British Soviet schools, universities and Institutions. The English Constitution Party is the only party that seeks full independence, the English Democrats (British) want a devolved parliament that leaves the British control and Institutions in place. The English Constitution Party have at it’s heart (manifesto) the English Constitution, constitutional statutory laws, ancient laws and customs protecting you as an individual. Time In Memorial. So mote it be.
There are two unions. Monarchy vs Political
1. The Union of the crowns happened in 1603 relatively benign and constitutionaly needed as part of the protection system via the separation of powers. In England this power resides with the monarchy. In America it resides with the President. Both systems refer to this as the Executive.
2. Political union happened in 1706/7 – this union is what gave rise to what we call the deep state. The political union has usurped the English and Scottish constitutions and centralised power to London. The only way to reverse the damage to both Nations is to VOID (not repeal) these acts. This instantaneously restores the constitutions, voids all treaties and laws made under the British union. In effect a peoples reset. It puts the British elites into administration.
Voiding the acts of union would return England and Scotland to Constitutional distributed governance, governed by the people locally by the people for the people.
The “union of the crowns” the monarchy is unaffected by voiding the political union. Unless a referendum takes place to abolish the monarchy at a later stage. As a separate note. Parliament has unlawfully stated it is sovereign.
Crucially this unlawful declaration by parliament of sovereignty residing with them is treason, at the very least it is contempt of sovereign . In fact this very statement contravenes a number of ancient laws and customs, customary law and the common law offence of Contempt of Sovereign.
Contempt of the Sovereign.
Contempt of the Sovereign is an offence at common law. It is triable only on indictment and is punishable by fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court.
Halsbury’s Laws of England / Criminal Law (Volume 25 (2020), paras 1–552; Volume 26 (2020), paras 553–1014) / 7. Offences against the State / (1) Treason and Related Offences / 559. Contempt of the Sovereign.
Contempt of Sovereign refers to any action or behavior that shows disrespect, disobedience, or disregard towards the monarch or reigning sovereign. This includes actions such as refusing to obey royal orders, making disrespectful comments or gestures towards the monarch, or engaging in behavior that undermines the authority of the sovereign.
Contempt of Statute refers to any action or behavior that shows disrespect or disregard towards the laws or statutes of the land. This includes actions such as willfully disobeying or disregarding the provisions of a statute, interfering with the administration of justice, or impeding the lawful execution of a court order.
Here is the text from Halbury’s Laws of England Volume 14 on the topic of Contempt of Sovereign:
“Contempt of Sovereign. Any act or conduct, which shows disrespect or disobedience towards the monarch, is considered to be contempt of sovereign. This may include, but is not limited to, refusal to obey royal orders, showing disrespect or making derogatory comments or gestures towards the monarch or the royal family, and engaging in behavior that undermines the authority of the sovereign. Such actions may be considered a criminal offense and may be subject to punishment.”
Here is the text from Halbury’s Laws of England Volume 14 on the topic of Contempt of Statute:
“Contempt of Statute. Any act or conduct which shows disregard or disrespect towards the laws or statutes of the land may be considered to be contempt of statute. This may include, but is not limited to, wilfully disobeying or disregarding the provisions of a statute, interfering with the administration of justice, or impeding the lawful execution of a court order. Such actions may be considered a criminal offense and may be subject to punishment.” In effect not abiding by the English Bill of Rights 1688 is contempt of sovereign and statute.
In a nutshell: The common law system is Executive (Monarchy/President), Judiciary, Parliament (Constitutional separation of powers system) vs The Roman law administrative system a political union where no separation of powers exists, what we call an elected dictatorship.
Then see the blogs on English vs British. The English Constitution Party is the only party that seeks full independence, the English Democrats (British) want a devolved parliament that leaves the British control and Institutions in place. The English Constitution Party have at it’s heart (manifesto) the English Constitution, statutory laws protecting you as an individual.