Tonight 8pm on the Full English Show – Rumble https://rumble.com/DaddyDragonChannel/live
In a democracy, citizens have the right to vote for their leaders and representatives. This right is one of the most fundamental aspects of democracy and allows citizens to have a say in how their country is governed. However, some people choose not to exercise this right by refusing to vote in elections. While this is their personal choice, it can have negative consequences for the democratic process and individual rights.
When citizens choose not to vote, they are effectively abrogating their right to vote. Abrogation means giving up or renouncing a right, which is exactly what happens when people do not vote. This can be seen as a form of tacit agreement because by not voting against a particular candidate or party, they are allowing the majority to decide for them. In other words, if the majority of people vote for a particular candidate or party, even if it’s a slim majority, those who did not vote effectively allowed that majority to determine the outcome of the election.
This can have negative consequences for individual rights because it means that the minority can control the majority. In a democracy, the majority is supposed to rule, but if only a small percentage of people vote, the majority may not be truly representative of the population. This can lead to the majority ignoring the needs and desires of the minority, which can be harmful to individual rights.
In parliamentary terms, the majority refers to the number of elected representatives who support a particular party or coalition. The party or coalition with the most seats in parliament forms the government and has the power to make decisions and pass laws. However, it is important to note that the majority may not always represent the majority of the population, especially if voter turnout is low.
When people choose not to vote, they are effectively abstaining from the electoral process. Abstaining means choosing not to participate or to take part in a particular activity. In the context of an election, abstaining means not casting a vote for any of the candidates or parties. This can have negative consequences for democracy because it means that the majority is determined by a smaller percentage of the population.
For example, if only 50% of the population votes, and the winning party or coalition has 51% of the vote, then they only represent 25.5% of the population. In this case, the majority is actually a minority because they do not represent the will of the majority of the population. This can be problematic because it means that a small group of people has the power to make decisions that affect everyone.
By choosing not to vote, people are effectively abrogating their right to have a say in the electoral process. This can lead to a situation where the minority has more power than the majority, which can be harmful to individual rights and democracy. By not voting, people are allowing the very regime they object to to come to power because they are not actively opposing it.
One of the most important cases that established the constitutional right to vote and stand for election in the UK is Ashby vs White in 1703. This case involved a man named Ashby who was prevented from voting by the returning officer during an election. Ashby sued the officer, and the court ruled that Ashby had a constitutional right to vote and stand for election. This case established the principle that every citizen has a right to vote and that this right should not be abrogated or denied by anyone. In some cases, the media may be controlled by a small group of individuals or entities, who have a vested interest in maintaining their power and control over the government.
In such a situation, encouraging people not to vote is akin to encouraging them to tacitly agree with the status quo and the tyranny that may be present. If a small minority controls the media and uses it to discourage people from exercising their right to vote, they can easily manipulate the outcome of an election and further entrench their power. Social media influencers have a powerful voice in shaping public opinion, and if they use that voice to discourage voting, they are effectively doing the work of the tyrants and suppressing democracy.
In such a situation, it is important for individuals to be aware of the potential manipulation of the media and to seek out diverse sources of information to make informed decisions. It is also important for governments to ensure that media outlets remain independent and free from undue influence, to prevent any group or individual from monopolising the information available to the public. Which is why we are protesting outside Ofcom 23 04 2023, https://englishconstitutionparty.com/2023/03/07/rally-demo-petition-23-04-2023/
Ultimately, the right to vote is a fundamental aspect of democracy, and it is up to every citizen to exercise that right and safeguard their own freedoms and the freedoms of their fellow citizens.
In conclusion, while refusing to vote is a personal choice, it WILL and HAS had negative consequences for individual rights and the democratic process as a whole. It is important for every citizen to exercise their right to vote and participate in the democratic process to ensure that the majority truly represents the will of the people. The case of Ashby vs White shows how important the right to vote is and how it is a fundamental aspect of democracy.
By actively participating in the electoral process, citizens can help to ensure that the government represents their needs and desires, and that the minority does not have more power than the majority. It is important for individuals to educate themselves on the issues and the candidates before casting their vote, but ultimately, exercising the right to vote is one of the most important responsibilities of citizenship in a democratic society.
Lastly; Not voting is tacit agreement with tyranny, those that seek to persuade you not to vote are not your friends, do not have your best interests at heart, and ultimately damage our constitutional rights and common law rights. They also disrespect all those that died for our voting rights and freedoms!